House Chair Demands Trump Admin Disclose Legal Basis for Boat Strikes

URGENT UPDATE: Congressman Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) is calling for the Trump Administration to publicly disclose the legal justification behind recent U.S. strikes on suspected drug boats from Latin America. This demand follows a closed-door briefing on November 5, 2023, that aimed to clarify the government’s ongoing operations.

In a statement to The Epoch Times on November 12, Rogers, who chairs the House Armed Services Committee, expressed concern over the lack of transparency surrounding these military actions. “There was nothing that we should have been in a SCIF talking about,” he stated, referring to the sensitive compartmented information facility where the briefing took place. “They should be talking to all y’all, because it was very well done, completely legal what they’re doing, and they should be more transparent about it, in my view.”

The strikes, part of a broader initiative aimed at combating drug trafficking, have raised questions regarding their legal basis and the implications for U.S. military operations. Rogers’ comments highlight a growing demand among lawmakers for accountability and clarity in U.S. military engagements, especially those conducted in secret.

As this situation develops, the pressure mounts on the Trump Administration to clarify its stance. The implications of these strikes could resonate beyond the military sphere, affecting public perception and international relations.

With lawmakers like Rogers at the forefront, the narrative surrounding U.S. military actions is shifting toward demands for greater transparency. The call for public disclosure comes at a time when military operations often face scrutiny for their legality and ethical considerations.

Expect further updates as this story unfolds, including potential responses from the Trump Administration and additional commentary from military experts. The urgency of this matter cannot be understated, as it touches on both national security and the principles of democratic oversight.