DOJ Negotiates $50 Million Settlement with Mike Flynn Over Lies

BREAKING: The Department of Justice is in urgent negotiations to settle a significant claim with Michael Flynn, a close ally of former President Donald Trump, who is demanding $50 million for what he alleges was a wrongful prosecution for lying to the FBI. This development comes after Flynn pleaded guilty on December 1, 2017, to a felony charge regarding his communications with Russia’s ambassador.

Flynn’s attorney, Jesse Binnall, claims that “rogue FBI actors orchestrated a politically motivated hoax” that devastated Flynn’s life and career. Binnall argues that the government’s actions drained Flynn of millions in lost opportunities and legal fees while rewarding those he describes as “bad-faith saboteurs.” This shocking assertion raises serious questions about the integrity of the FBI’s previous investigations and the implications for taxpayer dollars.

The settlement talks represent a stark shift from the Justice Department’s earlier stance during the Biden administration, where they successfully defended against Flynn’s civil damages lawsuit. Flynn’s claims were dismissed in court last year, but the tide appears to be turning as negotiations gain momentum.

In addition to Flynn’s case, Binnall also represents Stefan Passantino, a former deputy White House counsel, who is negotiating his own settlement with the DOJ. Passantino alleges that his reputation was tarnished by the January 6 Committee due to what he describes as fabricated claims against him. He is seeking accountability for damages he contends have cost him his livelihood.

The implications of these negotiations extend beyond Flynn and Passantino, as they highlight a broader pattern of the DOJ potentially providing financial restitution to Trump allies while simultaneously pursuing legal actions against those perceived as enemies of the former president.

As the DOJ navigates these complex cases, they are also engaged in a separate lawsuit brought by defendants linked to the January 6 riot, who are demanding over $100 million for what they claim was a “malicious” prosecution. A federal judge has yet to rule on the DOJ’s motion to dismiss this case, adding to the urgency surrounding these developments.

Authorities have notified the courts of their settlement discussions as of September, indicating that the outcome could have significant ramifications for both Flynn and Passantino.

As negotiations unfold, the nation watches closely. Will the DOJ’s willingness to settle signal a new era of accountability or the continuation of partisan battles? Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.