Right-Wing Outlet Risks Major Libel Lawsuit Over False Claims

URGENT UPDATE: A right-wing media outlet, The Blaze, is facing backlash and potential legal action after publishing a controversial article alleging that a female CIA employee planted pipe bombs during the January 6 attack. The article, which claimed to solve a mystery that has baffled investigators for years, has been met with skepticism and criticism from both legal experts and fellow right-wing commentators.

The article was published just days ago, generating significant attention from prominent Republicans, including Kari Lake and members of Congress such as Barry Loudermilk and Thomas Massie. In a shocking claim, Anna Paulina Luna declared on social media that a Capitol Police officer was responsible for the bomb placement, framing the article as proof of a broader conspiracy against Republicans.

However, the claims are unraveling rapidly. Will Sommer from The Bulwark reported on Monday that the evidence presented by The Blaze is highly questionable. The article relied on a “forensic match” derived from “gait analysis” by an amateur online investigator known as Armitas, without producing substantial evidence, such as actual video comparisons.

Furthermore, the FBI and DOJ have not commented on these allegations, raising concerns about the validity of The Blaze’s claims. Critical errors have also emerged, including a mischaracterization of the woman’s role at the CIA, incorrectly stating she was part of the security detail for Director John Ratcliffe when she is actually a security guard.

The implications of this story are significant. The woman identified has previously testified against January 6 participants and was photographed using pepper balls against rioters. This has sparked speculation that she was targeted by far-right media for retaliation.

As the story collapses, several right-wing platforms that initially promoted it have since distanced themselves. Lawmakers like Luna have quietly deleted their endorsements, and even prominent figures like Glenn Beck are backing away, emphasizing the need to respect the presumption of innocence.

The turmoil within the right-wing media sphere is palpable, with Julie Kelly, a notable MAGA commentator, labeling the story as “weak,” igniting further division among far-right pundits. The fallout from this story may lead to severe legal repercussions for The Blaze, as experts suggest they have exposed themselves to a “mammoth libel lawsuit.”

As this situation develops, the stakes remain high. The implications for media credibility and the integrity of political discourse are profound. Stay tuned for further updates as this story unfolds.