Connect with us

Politics

Geneva Preservation Commission Denies Demolition of Historic Structure

editorial

Published

on

The Geneva Historic Preservation Commission has once again denied a demolition request for a historic limestone structure located at 4 E. State St., the site of the former Mill Race Inn. On December 16, 2023, the commission unanimously rejected the appeal put forth by Dave Patzelt, president of the Geneva-based Shodeen Group, which sought to tear down the building that has been a point of contention within the community for several years.

The limestone building, which dates back to the mid-19th century, has served multiple purposes throughout its history. Originally the Alexander Brothers’ Blacksmith Shop, it transitioned into various roles, including a carriage painting shop and a cooperage, before becoming part of the Mill Race Inn, a restaurant that operated from the 1930s until its closure in 2011. After the restaurant closed, Shodeen Group acquired the property, and demolition of much of it began in 2016.

During the commission’s meeting, Patzelt argued that the structure, which he claims “stands in the way of” redevelopment goals, has not yielded positive results in the eight years since discussions began. He stated that the cost of repairing the building outweighs its value, and he called for the city to consider the demolition request based on what he described as a lack of community interest in preserving the site.

In response, several commissioners expressed skepticism about the request. Commissioner Jewel Jensen noted that previous efforts, funded by taxpayers, to determine the property’s future were unsuccessful due to the owner not submitting development plans for approval. Jensen raised concerns about potential penalties the city could face if the demolition were approved, given the ongoing disputes surrounding the property.

The discussions at the meeting revealed a split opinion among local residents. Some advocated for the preservation of the structure, highlighting its historical significance and potential for future redevelopment. Al Watts, community engagement director for Preservation Partners of the Fox Valley, emphasized the opportunity for collaboration between the community and the property owner, suggesting that a restored site could honor Geneva’s industrial past while stimulating future growth.

Conversely, others voiced frustration over the building’s deteriorating condition. Resident Herb Nachreiner criticized the property as an eyesore impacting the city’s business district, arguing that its presence discourages investment and tourism. He urged for progress, stating, “Move on. We’re beating a dead horse with this building.”

The meeting also highlighted the ongoing challenges faced by the property owner. While Shodeen Group has been criticized for allowing the building to deteriorate, Patzelt claimed that the lack of a clear redevelopment plan from the city has hindered progress. He reiterated that the structure’s condition has not improved since the last demolition request was denied in August 2023.

Following the public hearing, the commission ultimately reaffirmed its opposition to the demolition request. The decision, however, does not mark the end of the matter. Patzelt has filed an appeal with the Geneva City Council, which has the authority to amend or reverse the commission’s decision. According to city regulations, the council must vote on the appeal within 30 calendar days.

The ongoing debate over the future of the limestone building at the former Mill Race Inn site reflects broader tensions between historical preservation and urban development. As community members and city officials continue to navigate these discussions, the final outcome remains uncertain, with the potential for further hearings and community engagement in the months ahead.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.