Connect with us

Politics

Review Study Advances Understanding of Historical Structure Materials

editorial

Published

on

The preservation of historical structures is vital for maintaining connections to humanity’s artistic and architectural heritage. A new review study has been published, highlighting the importance of understanding the properties of building materials used in these structures. Conducted by a research team from the Department of Civil Engineering at Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University in Türkiye, this study, titled “Materials Characterization of Historical Structures: A Review,” aims to address gaps in the current methods used for material characterization.

This comprehensive review evaluates various analytical techniques for characterizing historical building materials, including natural stones like limestone and granite, as well as various types of mortars. The research aims to synthesize existing findings while clarifying the strengths and limitations of each characterization method. The findings are intended to guide researchers in selecting appropriate methodologies for their work.

Core Analytical Techniques Evaluated

The study systematically reviews key aspects of material characterization, focusing on four core categories of techniques.

Physical and thermal property analysis methods include Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry (MIP), which assesses porosity and pore structure. For instance, MIP has identified two main pore size distributions in mortars from Amaiur Castle. Additionally, Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) and Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA) evaluate thermal resistance, revealing that calcite decomposes between 600 °C and 900 °C, with a mass loss of 20% to 40% due to carbon dioxide emissions.

Chemical property analysis employs various techniques, such as X-ray Diffraction (XRD) to determine mineral compositions, including calcite and quartz prevalent in many mortars. Other methods, like X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), help quantify elemental and component analysis, providing insights into the materials’ foundational chemistry.

The study also assesses mechanical property analysis through non-destructive methods, including Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV), which correlates wave speed with the quality of concrete. Other methods, such as the Schmidt hammer and Flat-jack tests, measure surface hardness and in-situ stress, respectively, allowing for evaluations without damaging the historical structures.

Finally, visualization techniques like Scanning Electron Microscopy-Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) provide detailed microstructural analysis. Infrared Thermography (IRT) is particularly useful for detecting moisture and hidden cracks, demonstrating its effectiveness in identifying invisible defects in structures like the Malatya Taşhoran Church.

Implications for Future Research and Conservation

The review references extensive studies on benchmarks, including Roman-period structures in Portugal and 11th to 14th-century buildings in Spain. These case studies validate the effectiveness of the reviewed techniques, confirming that a combined approach yields more reliable results.

The implications of this research extend beyond academic interest. By providing a data-driven foundation for scientific inquiry, the findings aim to reduce costs in engineering and architectural analyses of historical structures. Furthermore, they support the development of restoration projects grounded in scientific understanding, ensuring that these cultural treasures can be preserved for future generations.

The paper, authored by Mertcan Demirel, Alican Topsakal, and Muhammet Gökhan Altun (corresponding author), represents a significant step forward in the field of cultural heritage preservation. For those interested in exploring the full text, it is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-025-1222-3.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.