Understanding Vertical Morality: The MAGA-Christian Paradox

The concept of vertical morality has come under scrutiny as it highlights the paradox between Christian teachings and the political landscape shaped by MAGA (Make America Great Again) ideologies. This ethical framework, which suggests that moral behavior is dictated by an external authority—often viewed as God—raises questions about how individuals can support policies that seem at odds with the core Christian values of love and compassion.

Many Americans find the divide between Christian principles and MAGA politics perplexing. How can individuals profess faith in Jesus, who advocated for love, mercy, and care for the marginalized, while endorsing policies that appear to harm immigrants, vilify LGBTQ communities, and endorse punitive measures? The answer may lie in the framework of vertical morality, which prioritizes obedience to authority over the well-being of others.

Malynda Hale, executive director of The New Evangelicals, a nonprofit organization advocating for inclusivity and justice within Christianity, explains that vertical morality teaches that moral codes and ethical standards come from an authority above, typically viewed as God. This authority dictates what is deemed acceptable or unacceptable, creating a system where righteousness is measured not by kindness to others but by adherence to these established rules.

In contrast, Klinger Cain describes horizontal morality, which emphasizes the welfare of individuals, communities, and relationships. This approach prioritizes empathy and the minimization of harm, regardless of one’s beliefs. For example, a person with vertical morality may assist someone in need because they interpret it as fulfilling God’s will, while someone with horizontal morality would act out of genuine concern for that person’s welfare.

The implications of these ethical frameworks extend beyond theology into the realm of politics. In the context of contemporary American politics, particularly during the Trump administration, vertical morality has been weaponized by some conservative Christian nationalists. They often view their political allies as good and aligned with God’s will, whereas those who oppose them are seen as evil.

According to Ajoy, a commentator on these issues, this mindset can lead to the justification of harmful policies under the guise of divine mandate. “They promote a view of God that is vengeful,” Ajoy states, noting how this perspective demonizes various groups, including immigrants and members of the LGBTQ community, while failing to provide evidence for such claims.

The intersection of vertical morality and politics can also be observed in the harsh treatment of undocumented immigrants. Klinger Cain notes that under a vertical moral framework, even minor infractions are met with severe punishment, as every disobedience to divine law is viewed as deserving of reprimand. This perspective often leads to a desensitized view of suffering, where inhumane policies are rationalized as upholding moral standards.

The narrative surrounding vertical morality raises serious concerns about the implications for social justice and collective responsibility. Hale emphasizes that this framework can lead to a society where personal righteousness is prioritized over the needs of the community, potentially blinding individuals to injustice and allowing harmful behaviors to persist unchecked.

While vertical morality offers a comforting sense of certainty, especially in times of cultural change, it can also foster a dangerous complacency. Klinger Cain points out that the straightforward nature of this moral structure appeals to individuals seeking clarity amid chaos. However, such simplicity can result in a lack of critical engagement with deeper societal issues.

As the influence of vertical morality continues to shape political discourse, it becomes essential to promote a more balanced approach that incorporates both vertical and horizontal ethics. This perspective acknowledges the need for personal piety while also emphasizing responsibility toward others.

Hale concludes that true faith must be active and grounded in love for others, stating, “We always say faith without works is dead. Faith without action is incomplete.” The challenge moving forward lies in fostering a more inclusive understanding of morality that embraces compassion alongside adherence to spiritual beliefs.

The ongoing discourse around vertical morality serves as a reminder of the complexities within contemporary Christianity and its relationship with politics. As society navigates these challenges, it is crucial to engage in thoughtful conversations about the ethical frameworks that guide our actions and beliefs.