New York AG Accuses Trump Prosecutor of Hiding Over 100 Pages of Evidence

URGENT UPDATE: New York Attorney General Letitia James has leveled serious accusations against Lindsey Halligan, President Donald Trump’s controversial prosecutor, alleging that Halligan is concealing over 100 pages of critical evidence in a significant fraud case. This revelation, reported by Talking Points Memo just moments ago, intensifies an already contentious legal battle.

James’ legal team has filed a motion urging the judge to compel the Justice Department to release documents purportedly handed over to prosecutors by former FHFA Acting Inspector General Joe Allen. The filing underscores a troubling gap in the discovery materials received thus far, suggesting that crucial information has been omitted from Halligan’s case against James.

The accusations stem from Halligan’s claims of bank fraud, alleging that James misrepresented multiple properties as primary residences on mortgage statements. James has firmly denied any wrongdoing, and outside legal experts have voiced skepticism, pointing to publicly available evidence that contradicts Halligan’s assertions. Notably, internal communications from prosecutors have raised doubts about the validity of the case.

“This situation reveals a disturbing lack of transparency,” said a member of James’ legal team.

“The absence of over 100 pages of documents is alarming and suggests obstruction of justice.”

The allegations against James follow a series of firings at the FHFA, where Allen and other officials were reportedly dismissed amid inquiries into whether Bill Pulte—who accused James—improperly accessed mortgage data concerning political adversaries. The administration claimed these dismissals were part of a broader initiative to promote Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policies, which allegedly clash with Trump’s directives.

Adding to the controversy, Halligan is facing scrutiny regarding her own appointment as U.S. attorney and whether she is authorized to pursue these prosecutions. Critics argue her actions reflect a politically motivated agenda rather than legitimate legal proceedings.

This situation is evolving rapidly. Legal experts and political analysts are closely monitoring the case to see how these allegations could influence ongoing investigations and the implications for both Trump and James moving forward. As this story develops, the potential fallout could have significant ramifications for political accountability and legal integrity in high-profile cases.

Stay tuned for more updates as further information becomes available.