Connect with us

Business

US Blocks Coal Lease Bid for 6 Million Tons in Utah Forest

editorial

Published

on

Federal officials have rejected a mining company’s proposal to lease over 6 million tons of coal located beneath the Manti-La Sal National Forest in Utah. This decision represents the third proposed coal sale from public lands in the western United States to be denied this month, as reported by the Interior Department on October 5, 2023. The failed sales highlight ongoing challenges in the coal industry, which has experienced significant declines over the past two decades.

The Interior Department turned down the only bid it received for two tracts of federal coal reserves because it did not meet the requirements outlined in the Mineral Leasing Act. Specifically, companies are mandated to pay fair market value for coal extracted from public lands. An agency spokesperson, Alyse Sharpe, did not disclose the amount of the rejected bid. The bid was submitted by a subsidiary of Wolverine Fuels LLC, which operates the nearby Skyline Mine and other coal mines in central Utah.

In a competitive sale held on October 1, 2023, officials offered a lease for one tract containing 1.3 million tons of coal. The other tract, which holds approximately 5 million tons, was a modification to an existing lease. The rejected offer encompassed both tracts, according to Sharpe.

Despite the setbacks, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum announced two weeks ago plans to open 13 million acres of federal lands for coal mining. However, the future of coal mining remains uncertain as utilities increasingly opt for cheaper energy sources, such as natural gas and renewable options like wind and solar power. Emissions from coal combustion are significant contributors to climate change, causing rising sea levels and more extreme weather.

On October 6, 2023, a proposed coal sale in Montana, which would have been the largest in over a decade, attracted a single bid of just $186,000, approximately one-tenth of a penny per ton. This lease was expected to yield 167 million tons of coal near the Spring Creek mine operated by the Navajo Transition Energy Company. Shortly thereafter, the Interior Department postponed an even larger sale involving 440 million tons of coal adjacent to the Antelope Mine in Wyoming.

Sharpe attributed the failed sales to the policies of former Presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama, asserting that they attempted to undermine domestic production and erode investor confidence in the coal industry. Both administrations had sought to limit coal sales from public lands, although these policies were reversed under the Trump administration.

While three coal lease sales under President Trump succeeded, the largest involved 54 million tons of coal in Alabama, which sold last month for $46 million, translating to approximately 87 cents per ton. In contrast, two recent sales in North Dakota, comprising a combined 30 million tons, generated just $186,000 total, equating to less than one penny per ton.

As demand for reliable energy grows, Sharpe emphasized that coal remains a vital component in providing affordable and dependable power for Americans. Yet, industry analysts suggest that market dynamics, including the rising costs of coal compared to alternative fuels, are the primary reasons for the industry’s decline. Many coal-fired power plants in the West are nearing the end of their operational lives.

Environmental advocates have long opposed the expansion of the Skyline Mine, with Emma Yip from the Center for Biological Diversity characterizing the rejection of the coal bid as “yet another face-plant for the Trump administration.” Yip added that coal is among the dirtiest energy sources, contributing to significant health issues and environmental degradation. “There’s no defensible reason to keep it on life support when absolutely nobody wants it,” she stated.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.