Federal Judge Dismisses Family’s Suit Over Fatal Gastonia Shooting

UPDATE: A federal judge has just dismissed a civil lawsuit filed by the family of Jason Lipscomb over his fatal shooting by Gastonia police, ruling that the officers’ use of force was legally justified. In a decision rendered on February 2, 2026, Judge Kenneth D. Bell granted the defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings after reviewing critical body-worn camera footage.

This urgent ruling effectively closes the family’s 2025 Section 1983 case unless they choose to appeal. According to Judge Bell’s Memorandum and Order, the video evidence “blatantly contradicts” numerous allegations made by the family, leading him to conclude that the officers acted in a manner that was “objectively reasonable.”

The incident in question occurred on July 20, 2022, when officers were called to a home after reports of two children being taken without authorization. Witnesses and video footage revealed Lipscomb attempting to flee in a silver car, during which he reversed and collided with an officer, subsequently driving toward another officer. In response, officers opened fire, resulting in Lipscomb’s death.

Judge Bell noted that one officer appeared to have been struck by the vehicle during this chaotic encounter, reinforcing the justification for the use of lethal force. His ruling referenced legal precedents from the Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit that permit such actions in scenarios involving fleeing vehicles.

Lipscomb’s family has been vocal in their criticism of the shooting, viewing the dismissal as a significant setback in their quest for accountability. “They shot my son,” said Robert Hamlett, Lipscomb’s father, expressing his anguish to reporters. As of now, the family and their legal team have not confirmed plans for an appeal.

The court’s decision has reignited discussions surrounding policing practices in Gastonia. Community groups had previously organized protests following the shooting, emphasizing concerns over how police departments handle high-pressure situations. Many residents argue that the use of lethal force in residential areas raises serious questions about officer conduct.

The dismissal of this case underscores the powerful role of body-worn video and the legal doctrine of qualified immunity in determining the outcome of civil suits involving police actions. As the community processes this ruling, all eyes are on the family as they deliberate their next steps.

Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story.