Connect with us

Top Stories

Virginia Assembly Fails to Rein in Data Center Growth: Urgent Update

editorial

Published

on

UPDATE: The Virginia General Assembly is facing intense criticism as more than 60 data center-related bills introduced this session stall or are continued to next year. With less than two weeks left in the session, advocates warn that legislation passed may insufficiently address the overwhelming growth of data centers, which are increasingly straining the state’s vital resources.

Chris Miller, president of the Piedmont Environmental Council, emphasized the urgent need for oversight: “The energy infrastructure, the water supply infrastructure… is going to affect 100 times more land than the data center footprint itself.” Virginia is already grappling with a crisis, as data centers currently account for over 20% of the state’s electricity consumption—a figure that could surge to between 39% and 57% by 2030, according to the Electric Power Research Institute.

Miller points out the staggering financial implications: “We’re talking about tripling the system and needing an investment between $400 to $500 billion in infrastructure to support these data centers.” The General Assembly’s inaction is frustrating many, as crucial opportunities for regulatory action slip away.

Two key bills, SB619 and SB339, designed to enhance regulatory powers over data centers, have garnered some bipartisan support but are stagnating. SB619 would require high-load facilities to seek approval from the State Corporation Commission (SCC) before construction, ensuring they meet necessary energy and infrastructure requirements. Despite passing in the Senate, a House subcommittee has recommended shelving it.

Meanwhile, SB339 aims to study cost allocation for energy transmission from high-load customers and has also hit a wall in the House. Miller stresses, “There are some good bills that passed, but they don’t address the core problem, which is we’re approving data centers too fast.”

Governor Abigail Spanberger has yet to comment on whether she supports stronger regulatory measures. Advocates are particularly concerned about the long-term impacts on Virginia’s water supply, as large data centers can consume up to 5 million gallons of water daily for cooling. Although a 2024 report found current water use sustainable, it flagged rising consumption and lack of centralized oversight as critical issues.

A proposed bill, HB589, aimed to require water utilities to report on data center water usage, has already died in committee, while SB553, which proposes similar requirements, is headed to a conference committee with the House version relaxing the standards.

Additional legislation includes measures for utility demand flexibility for high-energy customers and stricter emission standards for data centers. The Senate’s budget proposal includes nearly $1 billion in potential revenue from ending the data center sales and use tax exemption, while the House version does not.

Supporters of data centers argue they are vital for job creation, with the industry currently responsible for 74,000 jobs and contributing $9.1 billion to Virginia’s economy annually. The Data Center Coalition defends the economic benefits, stating that Virginia’s appeal as an investment destination hinges on its competitive tax and regulatory environment.

As the clock ticks down on the legislative session, advocates urge immediate action. “The House must realize that this isn’t sufficient, and the governor needs to send a strong signal,” Miller implores. The future of Virginia’s resources hangs in the balance as urgent calls for accountability and oversight grow louder.

Stay tuned for more updates as the situation develops.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.